Joint Petition Filing For Divorce in California
January 6, 2026
Senate Bill 1427 (SB 1427) proposes an additional way for the public to file jointly for a divorce. Prior to the introduction of SB 1427, a limited portion of the public did have the option to file a Summary Divorce, which is a joint filing with limitations.
Background: Joint Petition Filing in California
Briefly, in a Summary Divorce you cannot own real estate, you must adhere to property limitations and/or debts and have NO minor children, adopted children or unborn children of the marriage.
The new additional option to the court process gives broader leeway to the joint filing procedure to allow for children and property to be included. The SB 1427 removes existing barriers from the Summary Divorce, which is still available. Obviously, both parties must agree and file jointly. Joint filing is intended to streamline the legal process, but does it? Let's take a closer look.
As you know, I am not an attorney, so this is my opinion after a close review of the FL-700 Information Sheet for Joint Petition Filing provided by the Court. This is not a review of the "law" but rather my expertise as a Legal Document Assistant specializing in family law processing
PROS:
(1) In reviewing the process, I found one benefit. The date the Joint Petition is filed is considered the effective date of service, which eliminates the need to have the other party served. The mandatory time required by law to finalize any divorce in California is 6 months and one day from date of service.
CONS:
(1) Double Filing Fees. Both parties must pay separate filing fees. The current filing fees for two people are $870.00, which is not required in a default case when one party files. (2) Fee Waiver. Both parties must qualify to obtain fee waivers.
(3) Double Disclosures. A joint filing requires each party to prepare Preliminary Disclosures (not required in a true default, only the Petitioner must provide full disclosures).
(4) Eliminates the Default Process Opportunity.
(5) Revokable Petition. Either party can revoke the Joint Petition before the court enters a judgment. Revoking the Joint Petition will not dismiss the case or revoke your general appearance. It will, however, move your case to a different process.
In Conclusion
While I appreciate the efforts of State of California to "try" and streamline and simplify the lengthy divorce process, in my humble opinion, I don't think it is going to be that effective. The winner is the Court. The Court now collects double court fees up front for an uncontested case. Ask yourself why? We already have a process; it is called a Default Divorce. When you file jointly, this opportunity is eliminated. In a default case, only the Petitioner pays the first appearance fee. Both parties can still enter into a Marital Agreement, but the Respondent does not have to pay a first appearance fee because there was no Response filed.
Pay attention to #5 above in red, the "different process" the Court is talking about is taking you backwards.
Now, you are at-issue (contested) and the only way to bring your case back full circle is with a marital agreement; otherwise, you are headed for the trial calendar. It gets complicated. Before you take this step, I urge you to call Divorce City to discuss your particular situation. Remember, there is more than one way to skin a cat.
Disclaimer: Divorce City 911 are not attorneys and is a legal document service that is owned and operated by Patti Johnson, registered in Kern County, California LDA #105. The contents contained in this blog are the opinions of the author and should not be construed as legal advice. Anyone seeking legal advice must consult with an attorney licensed by the State of California.
Recent Blogs










